Perpetual State Of Election Fraud
Hamster in a perpetual loop represents democrate/uniparty state election ballot fraud trampling a vote.
Hamster on top = ballot fraud.
Hamster on bottom = a valid vote.
(Credit) breitbart.com
The Journalism Competition and Preservation Act (JCPA) contains a loophole that would allow foreign news organizations, including Chinese organizations, to influence the flow of information in the United States — even as lawmakers prepare to attach the derided media bailout bill to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), a bill to fund national defense.
The JCPA has already attracted condemnation for its core elements, namely the transfer of wealth to already-wealthy media companies and the potential for the media industry to demand more censorship from Silicon Valley platforms.
But the China concerns, which are reportedly attracting attention on the Hill, add another twist to the story of a bill that has repeatedly been revived from the dead by media lobbyists over the past two years.
The JCPA creates a “must carry and must pay” scheme, forcing U.S. tech companies both to carry and pay for the content of news organizations through mandatory arbitration agreements.
The news organizations are not limited to U.S. ones, meaning the JCPA would require U.S. companies to carry and subsidize a range of publications that spread propaganda from foreign sources.
This would open up the U.S. to increased foreign influence over American political and social movements, and increased exposure to CCP-supported narratives.
The potential to empower foreign adversaries is particularly extraordinary given that lawmakers are planning to attach it to the NDAA, a “must pass” bill that is meant to fund U.S. national defense.
There is a narrow exception in the JCPA carving out publications that are clearly “owned or controlled” by foreign powers. This very weak exception has not been revised since the JCPA was introduced and would instantly be abused by Russian, Chinese, and other foreign interests. “Owned or controlled” does not mean Chinese or Russian entities cannot partner or pay publications in other countries to carry their propaganda.
This is increasingly happening with entities like China Daily that ‘partner’ with U.S. publications to “insert articles that portray the Chinese government and life in China in a positive light,” including mainstream publications like Time and the L.A. Times.
Freedom House recently highlighted Beijing’s increasing global media influence, which would be strengthened by a bill like JCPA.
Adverse foreign interests will be able to leverage JCPA to convey propaganda to U.S. audiences, including by disguising their ownership of U.S.-facing publications, partnering with U.S. publications, and broadcasting foreign content on U.S. platforms.
Many of the publishers that would benefit from JCPA are currently carrying advertisements and affiliated content from entities that are owned, controlled, or influenced by the CCP and its affiliates.
The JCPA bill in congress would effectively require U.S. platforms to carry CCP-promoted speech.
JCPA also damages U.S. competitiveness and strategic interests by primarily targeting U.S. companies and excluding foreign rivals from scope.
The JCPA, essentially a transfer of wealth from Silicon Valley to the discredited and distrusted corporate legacy media, is highly controversial. Beyond the financial payouts to media companies, they will be able to form a “joint negotiating entity”—a cartel, immune from antitrust law—to negotiate with Big Tech companies on the “terms and conditions” for carrying their content.
Censorship is sure to be a frequent demand of media companies. Despite provisions in the bill that purportedly stop media companies from negotiating the suppression of any one competitor, there is nothing to stop them asking their content to be prioritized over broadly-drawn categories that are used as pretexts for censorship, like “disinformation.”
Captain Convey Note
I fell prey to the media's manipulation of President Trump's recent Truth Social comment about the Constitution.
I had a knee jerk reaction to part of his quote.
The part that I had a knee jerk reaction to was taken out of context by the media.
I should have known better.
The quote below is just part of what President Trump said on TruthSocial.com
"A massive fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations and articles, even those found in the Constitution."
Yes Trump is correct the media and biden regime have presented a massive fraud to America.
Trump was trying to say there are rules, regulations and articles in the Constituion that need to be changed.
Initially I had a kneejerk reaction to President Trump's Truth Social Quote that the media has quoted over and over.
President Trump is noting the reason why Election Lawsuits fail.
Our U.S. Constitution permits election fraud and manipulation, as long as that state level election fraud and manipulation does not break federal law. {Direct Rumble Link}
President Donald Trump came under massive amounts of fire recently for saying, “So, with the revelation of MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION in working closely with Big Tech Companies, the DNC, & the Democrat Party, do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. Our great “Founders” did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!”
What President Trump is noting, is the exact same reason why Kari Lake’s lawsuit, like every other election lawsuit before it, will fail.
Our U.S. Constitution permits election fraud and manipulation, as long as that state level election fraud and manipulation does not break federal law. {Direct Rumble Link}
President Trump Was Correct About the Constitution and Elections – Kari Lake’s Lawsuit Shows Why (Click Link)
Captain Convey Bonus Note Of Disillusionment And Disgust
Talking about twitter and tweets on twitter all seem like a moot point.
A moot point is a point, an aspect, or a topic that is no longer relevant or can no longer be questioned or debated.
The Uniparty (Democrates/Republicans) work together to control the media.
This has included twitter.
Elon Musk was ask about the direct connection portal "homeland security" has to twitter content and his answer was he didn't know what it was for.
Maybe those in Reo Linda will buy that statement from Elon Must but anyone with common sense will not.
Twitter is a type of "bread and circus" side show.
Its true you can post your little tweet on twitter. I do.
Its like posting a note somewhere on a tree or something after a disaster hoping to find someone your looking for etc.
The influence of the tweet only matters if you have "followers" on twitter and these "followers" can be purchased from twitter.
Thats one way twitter makes money.
SO the higher the number of followers you have people are compelled to think the more important the tweet or statement is.
A JOKE.
Because you can actually buy followers on twitter when you see ANY twitter tweet etc it is a totally relative relation in proportion to the number of followers you have as to the importance of your tweet or statement.
Think of buying fake followers on twitter like ballot box fraud and ballot stuffing.
So you go to twitter.
You see a post I have made.
Twitter.com/CaptainConveyYou see I have only 1 follower.
You automatically equate the importance of my tweet to only 1 follower.
You ignore those tweet from people who don't have a large following.
I am automatically censored by you because I only have one follower.
You see another tweet where someone has several hundred or thousand followers.
You automatically think that tweet must be important and relevant.
The consensus thing kicks in automatically in your mind.
If you equate the importance of a statement/tweet on twitter to only the number of followers a person has you like so many others are duped again.
So twitter really is the modern day bread and circus / snake oil pitch and seller of information.
The corrupt Uniparty congress is about to pass the Journalism Competition and Preservation Act (JCPA).
This will make sure tweets on twitter are censored in a way the truth will be even more hidden.
My point is twitter is kind of a moot point.
All the tweets and talk about the election etc will just be echoes in a tin can.
Why?
The US Constitution allows states to make laws that allow ballot fraud.
The 2020 election and the 2022 midterm election republican Uniparty defeat in The US senate is the result.
Democate cartels in various states allow ballot fraud and can steal elections.
Thats why tweets on twitter seem like a moot point when the end game has been decided before its played.
Now to you understand?
The democrates have corrupted enough states to continue to steal elections.
I do think the states should be able to hold elections individually.
The problem is when a state election has been corrupted by ballot fraud it allows national elections to be stolen buy democrates with the help of the Uniparty republicans.
Covid-19 was a tool used to PERPETUATE and INCREASE ballot fraud in democate controlled states, aided by republicans in the Uniparty.
We are now in a state of perpetual state of election corruption and fraud.
National elections will continue to be stolen because of ballot fraud in a majority of states.
I am not optimistic this will change.
The Uniparty is in charge remember?
I of course will keep speaking my mind on my own website CaptainConvey.com as long as I can.
I will keep tweeting knowing its just an echo in a large tin can.
I don't give up.
The difference between “ballots” and “votes” - How Democrates Steal elections.
RESIST Fed Now CBDC Before Its To Late! (Don't become a SLAVE to programmable digital money.)
The 4 Constitutions of the UNITED STATES
The Trump 2024 Election Lottery 
The odds against his Winning the 2024 election have increased a little because President Trump's statement was taken out of context.
For those of you in Reo Linda, as Rush Limbaugh use to say, context is not a movie.