The Modern Electioneering Process of “Ballot Submission Assistance”
The difference between “ballots” and “votes” is previously explained {SEE HERE} and absolutely critical to understand before moving forward.
In 2022 wins and losses from the midterm election, one thing that stands out in similarity to the 2020 general election is the difference between ballots and votes.
It appears in some states this is the ‘new normal.’
Where votes were the focus, the Biden administration suffered losses.
Where ballots were the focus, the Biden administration won.
Perhaps the two states most reflective of ‘ballots’ being more important than ‘votes’ are Michigan and Pennsylvania. Despite negative polling and public opinion toward two specific candidates in those states, Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer and Pennsylvania Senate candidate John Fetterman achieved victories.
Whitmer and Fetterman were not campaigning for votes, that is old school. Instead, the machinery behind both candidates focused on the modern path. The Democrat machines in both states focused on ballot collection and ignored the irrelevant votes as cast.
Since the advent of ballot centric focus through mail-in and collection drop-off processes, votes have become increasingly less valuable amid the organizers who wish to control election outcomes. As a direct and specific result, ballot collection has become the key to Democrat party success.
The effort to attain votes for candidates is less important than the strategy of collecting ballots.
It should be emphasized; these are two distinctly different election systems.
The system of ballot distribution and collection is far more susceptible to control than the traditional system of votes cast at precincts.
A vote cannot be cast by a person who is no longer alive, or no longer lives in the area. However, a ballot can be sent, completed and returned regardless of the status of the initially attributed and/or registered individual.
While ballots and votes originate in two totally different processes, the end result of both “ballots” and “votes,” weighing on the presented election outcome, is identical.
While initially the ballot form of election control was tested in Deep Blue states, through the process of mail-in returns under the guise and justification of “expanding democracy,” a useful tool for those who are vested in the distinction, I think we are now starting to see what happens on a national level when the process is expanded.
The controversial 2020 election showed the result of making ‘ballots’ the strategy for electoral success. Under the justification of COVID-19 mitigation, mail-in ballots took center stage. Ballot harvesting by Democrat operations was one term for the outcome.
Democrat party officials and political activist groups knew how to exploit the opportunities within the new system of ballot distribution and collection, and when you combine that with a massive legal pressure campaign to accept any and all forms of ballots, well, you can see how they are dependent.
Now that ballot collection has been shown to be a much more effective way to maintain political power,
Democrats in a general sense are less focused on winning votes and more focused on gathering ballots.
When ‘ballot organization’ becomes more important than ‘vote winning,’ you modify your electoral campaign approaches accordingly.
It might sound simplistic, but inside the distinct difference between ballots and votes you will find why refusing debates is a successful strategy.
If you are trying to win votes you could never fathom campaign success by refusing to debate an opponent.
However, if your focus is centered around ballot collection, the debate is essentially irrelevant.
It’s time for voters to start seeing the difference between elections decided by ballots and elections decided by votes.
Perhaps the 2022 midterm election will awaken people to the two completely different electioneering systems.
You can vote at any scale you want.
However, when ballots are more important than votes – the election will always favor the former.
Michigan and Pennsylvania voters are likely very unhappy today, while Michigan and Pennsylvania ballot providers are smiling.
If Democrats had to win individual ‘votes’ to gain election success, they would be at a disadvantage.
As long as Democrats only need to gather ‘ballots’, they have a path to winning elections.
The processes of electioneering are all modified accordingly.
Campaigning, advertising, promoting, debating, hand-shaking, crowd attendance and venues for rallies, along with physically meeting people and convincing them of your worth, are only important if you are trying to win votes.
Fortunately for Democrats, modern electioneering via ballot collection does not require these arcane efforts.
So, in the larger picture of what you now see in elections, Democrats have stopped wasting time doing them.
Republicans are running around trying to convince people and win votes.
Meanwhile, who needs voters?
Democrats have skipped all of that old fashioned stuff and modified all of their electioneering systems to quietly and efficiently collect ballots.
On Nov 8, 2022 you saw the outcome.
A large percentage of conservatives, intellectually honest independents and even some establishment republican donors have read our research and are now starting to have the ‘votes‘ vs ‘ballots‘ conversation.
That understanding is critical, because any conversation that does not accurately identify and accept the problem is futile.
The RNC club knew exactly what the DNC club were doing in their 2022 midterm “ballot submission assistance” program. Yes, that’s exactly what “ballot harvesting” is called now. “Ballot Harvesting” is illegal in many states, “Ballot Submission Assistance” is not.
Progressive political activists in the state of Arizona are now scrubbing the footprints of their ballot submission assistance programs. Wait, Arizona(?) you say. Yes, Arizona a state where “ballot harvesting” is illegal, but email, fax, online and in person drop-off is possible. Ballot assistance is essentially the same harvesting process but in a smaller and more individualized scale.
REFERENCE and CONTEXT is critical to understanding.
After Eric Holder left the Obama administration as Attorney General, he was hired by the State of California to defend against the Trump administration in early January 2017 (LINK).
Why?
When Eric Holder left the Obama administration, his firm was contracted by California during a process of linking the motor vehicle registration files to the Secretary of State voter registration system. Holder was advising on part of a technology system being constructed to bridge the DMV and SoS offices.
You might know this as a “Motor/Voter” process. However, former AG Eric Holder had a very specific function in the construction of this technology bridge.
The process of adding voters to the registration rolls when they receive or update their driver’s license was seen as an opportunity to expand the voter rolls.
Making the voter rolls as big as possible is the key to the utilization of mass mail-out balloting.
I will skip the part where California started giving illegal aliens drivers licenses for a moment – you can obviously see how that would play with motor/voter rolls – instead I am choosing just to focus on the specifics of the Holder aspect.
The DMV needed to connect to the SoS office. This was simply a part of a tech system that needed to be built.
The Conservative Tree House has previously spoken with the lead engineer, a member of a very small technology group, who worked in the California information technology (IT) unit that was tasked with building the system that connected the DMV to the SoS.
In the process of connecting the two state networks together, there needed to be a “flag”, essentially a check box, where the applicant to the DMV would attest to being legally authorized to vote.
It is a positive affirmation, a check box, that says the Driver’s License holder affirms they are legally eligible to vote.
That affirmation (the technical flag in the process), when affirmed, then transmits the information to the SoS office with the DL operator identity, and the California driver is automatically added to the SoS rolls and registered to vote.
During the time when Eric Holder was the legal counsel for the California Secretary of State, the technology team was constructing the internal data processing systems.
The lead engineer in the unit was instructed to code the data transfer in such a way that even if the “check box” was left unchecked, the registration data would transmit from the DMV to the SoS office.
Essentially, instead of only those who affirmed their legal eligibility by checking the box, everyone -including those who did not check the box- would get a DL and would automatically have their information transmitted to the SoS office.
Everyone who received a driver’s license or state issued id was automatically going to be registered to vote, regardless of their legally authorized status.
That request led the engineer to contact the conservative tree house.
I wrote about it, published the details, then the engineer freaked out as he/she realized there was only a very limited number of people who could expose the issue. He/She was worried about his/her safety and family and asked me to remove the article. This background is how I know the details of who, what, when and why the California mass mailing ballot process was being constructed.
In the 2018 midterm elections we all watched the outcome of that process surface in the weeks following election day. As each day passed more and more California mail-in ballots were being counted and day-by-day Republicans who won on election day 2018 watched their lead evaporate.
What happened in the California 2018 midterm election surrounding state-wide ballot distribution, collection (harvesting) and eventual presentation to the counting and tabulation facilities, was the BETA test for the 2020 covid-inspired national ballot mailing process.
The outcome we are seeing from the 2022 midterm ballot collection program was not just similar to the 2020 general election ballot collection program, it is a direct outcome of the refined BETA test from 2018.
Now we have multiple states following the California mass distribution of ballots approach.
Washington state, California, Arizona, Colorado, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, New York, New Jersey, Michigan, there’s a long list.
In many states mass mailing of ballots is now codified in election law.
Activist election lawyer Marc Elias now coming in behind the construction team of Eric Holder with the legal arguments to support the ballot collection programs.
The Importance of Election Rolls – As you can see from the California initiation point (Motor/Voter), in order to most effectively use the mass distribution of ballots as an electioneering process you first need a massive state secretary voter file in order to generate, then mail, the physical ballots.
Remember, votes require people – ballots require systems.
Any institutional system that can link people into the SoS system to generate a larger registration file for ballot distribution is a net positive. The key point is not to generate voters, the key is to generate ballots – the more the better.
Mass printing of ballots is the origin of the electioneering process.
(Remember a Ballot is Not A verfied Vote but in the states that allow ballots, it is counted as a VERIFIED Vote.)
Any state or federal system that links a physical identity to the secretary of state voter rolls is good.
Any system, like the USPS postal change of address system, that would remove physical identities from the state voter rolls is not useful.
The goal is to maximize the number of systems that generate registration, that eventually generates ballots.
Beyond the Driver’s License issue, it’s everything.
(Ballots are sent out GALORE. Ballots that are counted as verified votes even though ballots are not verified votes.)
(Who needs to vote when you get registered to "vote" and are automatically sent a BALLOT to mail back in that is counted as a verified vote but IS NOT A VERFIED VOTE?)
Sign up for public assistance, get registered to vote.
Sign up for state benefits, get registered to vote.
Sign up for a state id, get registered to vote.
Sign up for state college, get registered to vote.
Sign up for a grant, get registered to vote.
Sign up for unemployment, get registered to vote.
Sign up for any state system and get registered to vote.
Get married, change names, change addresses, etc, that’s how the voter rolls expand and that’s how the massive distribution of ballots is created.
The states then fight against anything, any effort, any process, that would purge voter rolls or fix incorrect voting rolls.
To use the new electioneering system, the system operators need ballots created, they no longer need votes. They need ballots.
Downstream from this process that’s where you find the “ballot submission assistance” programs.
This is where the local community networks, regional activist groups and widespread community organizers come into play.
Instead of advertising or the previous electioneering systems around candidate promotion and Get Out The Vote (GOTV) efforts, the majority of donations to the DNC are now used in the ballot assistance programs.
SIDEBAR – Now keep in mind, the origination of the ballots starts with expanded voter rolls.
The rolls contain the registry status of people, regardless of their accuracy or inaccuracy.
If you were going to hire a printing company to send out fancy wedding invitations, you would need to provide that third-party with the names, addresses and details of the invitation recipients, right? Now, overlay ballots into a similar framework.
Do you remember the recent issue of Konnech (CEO Eugene Yu), an election technology company, indicted for transmitting the data files of every registered voter in Pennsylvania (and more) to China?
Inside that Konnech story is how the modern ballot creation issue connects to the activity of Eugene Yu. Did pre-printed ballots arrive en-mass, in the U.S.A, as a result of the massive data files transmitted to China? That might be a sticky-widget for quite a few interests. Then again, what state just dropped the charges against Yu on the day after the midterm election?
The RNC and DNC are Corporations.
Please understand that both the RNC and DNC are not government entities.
They are each private corporations with their individual agenda, rules and memberships.
These are corporations that function more like private clubs.
The biggest "private club" is the Corporation known as UNITED STATES.
The 4 Constitutions of the UNITED STATES
A corporation located in the district of columbia.
Act 1871 allows the "Corp US" to control the country in the place of the natural Government HERE and HERE.
When it comes to ballot collection as a newly enhanced modern electioneering process, the RNC club isn’t incompetent or stupid, they knew what the DNC club was doing.
The RNC club operated in the 2022 midterm election to support (willful blindness) the DNC club effort. Why? Because the RNC club wants to remove the problems they have with the populist movement. The issues are big.
The RNC Club wants, as billionaire donor Ken Griffin explained from his discussions with Ronna McDaniel, Ron DeSantis and Kevin McCarthy, to remove the populist elements within the Republican party, vis-a-vis MAGA, and realign with the multinational corporations on Wall Street.
“He wants to improve the diversity of the GOP and blunt the vein of populism that has complicated the party’s relationship with the corporate world — two things he’s consulted with House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy about.” (link)
As you can see, the issue of “votes” -vs- “ballots”, is not a singular issue for American voters. We have a mixed bag of mutually aligned common enemies in this process.
Republican politicians will support any process, including mass mailout ballot distribution and collection, regardless of its corrupt status, that will eliminate what they define as the problem within their club.
Their problem has a face….
.
Captain Convey Note
After reading the above Conservative Tree House article on the big difference between ballots and votes it should be crystal clear what the actual meaning of a ballot is and how it differs from an actual verified vote.
Ballots are NOT votes.
Ballots are used to steal elections by various means.
The 2020 election and 2022 midterm election results were skewed by ballots used in many states.
Lets not leave out the elephant in the room.
Ballots help insure incumbent office holders stay in office without fear of being "voted" out of office.
Ballots can be thought of as a form of TENURE for politicians.
If you live in a state where mail in ballots are considered valid votes this means the actual validated vote you cast is being skewed by ballots that are not actual validated votes.
An absentee ballot that is NOT verified is no different than an unverified mail in ballot.
States that keep counting mail in ballots after election day allow ballots to be dumped by ballot mules until they get the results they want.
Ballots take time to be counted, especially recently printed ballots used by ballot mules and democrates in states that allow ballots.
Also ballot "curing" takes time. This is known as fixing the ballot.
For those of you living in Reo Linda, as Rush Limbaugh use to say, ballot harvesting, ballot curing accounts for the 2020 and 2022 midterm elections to have been stolen by democrates using ballot fraud again.
In another post I stated Republicans should do as the dems do and just become ballot mules to up the vote.
I have reconsidered that notion and think it would not work at all for Republicans that live in democrate controlled blue states.
Democtates in a blue state wouldn't count a Republican or independent ballot that didin't indicate a democrate candidate that was up for election.
Think of ballots like you think of money printed by the federal reserve that has nothing to back the printed money up as actual money.
US currency is just a piece of paper that has a promise to pay that can't actually be backed up with actual assets.
A mail in ballot is just a piece of paper that is a "BLANK CHECK" that can be used as a fraudulent vote.
This "BLANK CHECK" ballot that isn't verified or is "cured" to make it look verified can also be printed at will.
No-Fault absentee ballots and mail in ballots allow ballot "vote" harvesting by ballot mules in 27 states.
ANY prediction President Trump made in the 27 states that allow for ballots to be counted as "votes" was a mistake.
Any hopeful comment by President Trump in the 27 states that allow for ballots to be counted as "vote" was a mistake.
This is because in 27 US States ballots can be used to steal elections.
2020 and 2022 midterm election outcomes are the result of ballot FRAUD in blue states and elsewhere ballots are used.
Lets get real. If your a Republican or independent voter in a blue state where ballots are used your "vote" is NEGATED by ballot FRAUD.
Elections are ONLY real in RED states that allow for absentee or mail in ballots to be VERIFIED before they are counted as real votes.
50-27= 23 States
23 US States doon't have no-fault absentee or mail in ballots.
Over half the vote in the US, 27 States, can be considered INVALID because of ballot FRAUD.
This is why the democates can claim victory in the 2020 midterm elections.
Ballot fraud elected democrates to the US senate and the US house of reps.
The uniparty continues in power.